<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Wireless Chip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nirenjan.com/2006/04/new-wireless-chip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nirenjan.com/2006/04/new-wireless-chip/</link>
	<description>My personal web diary, with ramblings on different topics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nirenjan</title>
		<link>http://www.nirenjan.com/2006/04/new-wireless-chip/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirenjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirenjan.com/2006/04/new-wireless-chip/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>@Ganga: You're the electronics expert here, not me. By the way, did you note the point about only a few transistors being required in the ILFD circuit? That would save a huge amount of real estate on the chip...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ganga: You&#8217;re the electronics expert here, not me. By the way, did you note the point about only a few transistors being required in the ILFD circuit? That would save a huge amount of real estate on the chip&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gangadhar</title>
		<link>http://www.nirenjan.com/2006/04/new-wireless-chip/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Gangadhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirenjan.com/2006/04/new-wireless-chip/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>That's a nice invention,Nirenjan!
I hope they do not plan to charge very much to license this technology because Cell Phone manufacturers do not care about battery life. If they did, they would have started using switching power supplies years ago instead of continuing to use linear supplies. By using a switcher instead of a linear supply they could more double the current battery life of a phone. Thats in real life, not just theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a nice invention,Nirenjan!<br />
I hope they do not plan to charge very much to license this technology because Cell Phone manufacturers do not care about battery life. If they did, they would have started using switching power supplies years ago instead of continuing to use linear supplies. By using a switcher instead of a linear supply they could more double the current battery life of a phone. Thats in real life, not just theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
